![]() ![]() After all, your goal is to get the best video quality, not to minimize your CPU usage (why did you buy a fast CPU if you're not going to use it? ) ) ![]() Then you should analyze the video file and compare the quality and actual frame rate (which may be lower than the requested frame rate). That means picking the highest resolution you can and recording it at the highest possible frame rate. ![]() ![]() If you want meaningful results, you have to do an actual benchmark. There are also various effects that can't be captured by that percentage, such as RAM usage, PCI Express usage and waits due to CPU/GPU synchronization. 80% CPU usage doesn't mean you're using 80% of the computation power of your CPU. For example, your CPU frequency depends on the load, and is not taken into account in the CPU usage. GPU: Zotac Nvidia Geforce GT630 (GK208 28nm: 384 Shaders / 8 ROPS) Zone Edition Passive Cooling 2GB DDR3 1800Mhz 64Bit (14.4Gb/s)ĬPU usage is a very inaccurate way to measure actual performance. MEM: 8GB DDR3 1333 (2x4) Patriot value (128 bit dual channel: 21.3 gb/s) When using SSR with ultrafast preset, give good quality but affect performance (CPU % around 25 to 30%), with obs-studio with 3750bitrate loss some quality but performance improve (CPU % stay around 15 a 18%) and now with ffmpeg libnvenc with 3500 / 4000 bitrate in various titles improve performance and quality too compared to regular obs-studio with same bitrateĬPU: INTEL Pentium G3220 (Haswell 22nm) 3.0Ghz (Dual-Core) Stock Clock mrdeathjr28, can you do some performance tests with SSR if you can get it to work?" I'm not convinced that this will be faster than x264 since there's a lot of overhead caused by the additional copies between video memory and RAM. "Looks like they are using some of the same names as x264, like 'preset', 'tune' etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |